<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World Wide Web Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ukfast.co.uk/2006/05/24/world-wide-web-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ukfast.co.uk/2006/05/24/world-wide-web-conference/</link>
	<description>News and views from the UK&#039;s best hosting provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:17:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://blog.ukfast.co.uk/2006/05/24/world-wide-web-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 09:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukfastblog.dev.text.co.uk/?p=113#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Well I thought I&#039;d take a look into the future with the new &#039;semantic&#039; search but nothing seemed to happen when I searched on swoogle?! 
So when its up and running gone will be the days when I type in &quot;a hotel in majorca that costs less than £50 a night, that has a large swimming pool, and is less than five minutes walk from the beach&quot; into google and get no results.. It all sounds very ambitious but good luck to them making it happen. I noticed on the BBC report it said &quot;almost all of the information on webpages is produced by humans for humans&quot; in my experience most of commercial sites are produced by humans for the googlebot. Lets hope a new &#039;semantic&#039; search will mean webpages are not primarily produced for the &#039;semantic search bot&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I thought I&#8217;d take a look into the future with the new &#8216;semantic&#8217; search but nothing seemed to happen when I searched on swoogle?!<br />
So when its up and running gone will be the days when I type in &quot;a hotel in majorca that costs less than £50 a night, that has a large swimming pool, and is less than five minutes walk from the beach&quot; into google and get no results.. It all sounds very ambitious but good luck to them making it happen. I noticed on the BBC report it said &quot;almost all of the information on webpages is produced by humans for humans&quot; in my experience most of commercial sites are produced by humans for the googlebot. Lets hope a new &#8216;semantic&#8217; search will mean webpages are not primarily produced for the &#8216;semantic search bot&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Norton</title>
		<link>http://blog.ukfast.co.uk/2006/05/24/world-wide-web-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 09:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukfastblog.dev.text.co.uk/?p=113#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Well JB, after looking at Swoogle I reckon this whole semantic web thing is going to have to get a lot more comprehensible before Joe Public will want to use it. In fact I think it&#039;s all a bit of a phantom - how on earth are IT bods going to manage to adhere to worldwide standards of data tagging when hardly anyone even manages to produce valid HTML?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well JB, after looking at Swoogle I reckon this whole semantic web thing is going to have to get a lot more comprehensible before Joe Public will want to use it. In fact I think it&#8217;s all a bit of a phantom &#8211; how on earth are IT bods going to manage to adhere to worldwide standards of data tagging when hardly anyone even manages to produce valid HTML?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

